For almost half a century, the United States and the Soviet Union/Russian Federation have used arms control treaties to help regulate their nuclear relationship.
Abstract The politics of nuclear arms control between the United States and Russia are in a protracted state of crisis, which is in need of explanation. This article provides an overview of...
THE GOVERNMENTS of China, Russia, and the United States all express support for arms control. They disagree profoundly, however, about its purposes and preconditions.
Formal cooperation between existing NWFZs is currently limited to the Conferences of Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones and Mongolia that are held in New York every five years (since 2005) in the lead up...
This issue requires a gradual and step-by-step approach and also a change of views and beliefs, reassuring measures and a daring will to save future generations from the scourge of war.
Nuclear weapons have different meanings depending on countries' perceptions of this phenomenon, such as destruction, power, and the prestige of security
It’s a delicate dance of waiting for the other party to make a move, and trying to guess what, exactly, your foe—and, at the same time, partner—is thinking. Time is also running out.
Over the past decade, growing tensions among the major nuclear powers have been accompanied by the intensifying risk of nuclear proliferation, nuclear competition, and nuclear weapons use.
The prior success of the NPT and the apparent firmness of member states’ agreement as to its importance, however, are not sufficient to guarantee its effectiveness in the future.